• 🔰Hurling⚜️Durling🔱@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Fuck off Google, now we need degoogled phones more than ever.

    *Sent from my cheap as fuck pixel 8a running graphene os

    Edit: ducking autocorrect you ducking duck

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    The point of this is to break Fdroid, as the point of removing device tree publishing from their phones was to remove third party ROMs that would ignore the requirement for verification, as well as the changes to AOSP updates. This is a war on users that want to keep control of their phones and when it’s done, you will not be able to escape the enshittification and surveillance. And I’m convinced that was the price they paid to get out of the FTC lawsuit.

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    20 hours ago

    That also means they now will know about every app installs, worldwide. So when the government comes in and ask who have installed this app they decided is bad, they can come get you.

    Signal, VPNs, they’ll have a list of everyone opting out of government-mandated backdoors.

    LineageOS so worth losing Play Integrity.

      • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Apps from outside the Play Store? No, because previously your phone had no reason to ask Google anything. You could always not sign in to Google and disable Play Protect and use F-Droid and Obtainium.

        But now, it needs to check developer signatures to know if it’s a verified developer, and it obviously can’t cache all of them as the size would be insane.

        And that in turn implies that your phone needs to reach out to Google and be like yo, is this app banned?

        That query gives them at minimum the IP of the user, the package name, and the time at which it happened.

        And thus they can effectively track anyone using say, privacy apps, making it that much riskier to use them in places where they’re not allowed.

        For your “safety”.

        • DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          55 minutes ago

          Apps from outside the Play Store? No, because previously your phone had no reason to ask Google anything.

          Play store seems to be sending list of all applications to ask for available updates. This is observable because play store offers me updates for apps I installed via f-droid and obtanium.

          But now, it needs to check developer signatures to know if it’s a verified developer, and it obviously can’t cache all of them as the size would be insane.

          Not how signatures usually work. You check the signing key (certificate) is signed by google key and you fetch a revocation list (banned developers). Of course, google could implement it in the way you suggest in theory, but I find it unlikely, since it would block offline installation for no reason.

          • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            39 minutes ago

            They said it would require network access and that they would have a handful of popular apps preloaded to avoid too much disruption so those can be installed offline. In practice that probably means Google apps, Meta apps and other big corp apps.

            They also have you register package names with them, not just a certificate.

            I was hoping it would be a certificate situation but we’re kind of past Google using the least intrusive and privacy preserving options.

  • Mike D@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    When it announced developer verification, it said the process would not evaluate the content of an app.

    Ok, sure. The ICE Block app Google just pulled from Play Store will not be evaluated.

  • Kalon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    ·
    1 day ago

    Paid or free, All I know is that I won’t be buying any device i can’t install my own apps on.

  • mesa@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    86
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why cant we be trusted with installing apps on our phones? Its my device, ill do what I want!

    Its so dumb.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      1 day ago

      Just wait until they start pushing this with computers too. We have continually coddled normies by dumbing shit down instead of pushing them to be smarter. No doubt they’ll look at this as a good thing too.

        • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          21 hours ago

          x86 is far too ingrained for that to happen. Even if it takes over on the consumer side of things, enterprise will still be stuck on x86 and you know how difficult it is to get them to change. The odds of it dying is exceedingly low.

          • phx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 hours ago

            This is one reason why the changes to the boot process on X86 were a major concern, if machines only boot an an OS with a “trusted” signing keys then it is a pretty straight path to MS-only. Lack of published architecture assist gets here and there are X86 machines that will fail spectacularly on Linux due to this (weird EFI boot stuff, certain chipsets for such drivers can’t be had or made, etc). Hardware-level DRM is a major threat.

            Then add in stuff like browser-based DRM. Oh cool, you can install whatever you want but this differently stuff will only play on Chrome with the DRM extension enabled, maybe sending CPUID info, and doing a bunch of other stuff for lock-in that makes the IE6+ActiveX/MS-JS pale in comparison

            • Pycorax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              I’m assuming this is referring to prebuilts? I can’t imagine this to be the case for DIY set ups.

              • phx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                It was everything for awhile, but the end architecture design did allow people to choose to not use secure-boot or to load their own keys on some boards. It did make some devices - mainly tabletized laptops - pretty much unusable for anything but the installed OS though.

                Browser DRM though… That’s just getting started

            • DarkAri@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Fuck those people we will just keep our own stuff and use it. This is one reason I have been hanging on to old hardware. I can still play games 20 years from now on my old PCs.

              • phx@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                5 hours ago

                I setup a mini PC that runs as a PXE server. Pretty much anything with an Ethernet port can boot from it and play a bunch of of classic games I’ve got on disc, plus some GoG titles etc. It’s awesome.

                Projects like OpenSpy also make some of the old dead titles playable again

          • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            12 hours ago

            This is why we still have 2G I heard. Telling regular customers to upgrade from 3G was easy. Like, what are they gonna do about it. But 2G is used by a lot of IoT devices, including gas and electric companies, and they’re not upgrading that easily while I assume generating a significant revenue.

            • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              5 hours ago

              What?

              In the US at least, AT&T shut down 2G in 2017, Verizon in 2019, and T-Mobile started shutdown of 2G in 2022 but has it still hanging on but on it’s final way out by the end of this year likely.

              Even for Europe, a lot of 2G shutdowns started in 2022, and most places in Europe will have 2G phased out by the end of this year.

              • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I am talking about Slovakia. That’s just what I remember seeing. Currently only Orange plans 2G shutdown, and that is for 2028.

                From the public documents I could find, it seems 2G is going to be mandatory until 31.12.2028, however only Orange has said something about its shutdown publicly so far.

        • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          23 hours ago

          There are plenty of ARM on PC examples and there will always be an alternative option that is open there. It’s too entrenched.

          We need to free mobile devices with function distros like mobian/postmarketos that are fully functional.

          • weirdo_from_space@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Yes there are, 90% can’t run Linux. And PCs built to specificly run Linux will only be available to Western markets, everyone else will be stuck with whatever corpos put out because they will be excluded by the weak currencies they use and in some cases also by prohibitive import taxes.

      • u/lukmly013 💾 (lemmy.sdf.org)@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Meh, Linux. There’s an alternative for those who want it, not a big deal. Smartphones, and most ARM devices are just weird to me. Device specific images, flashing, crap. Why can’t they just be PC-like?

        • jnod4@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 day ago

          Arm is slowly advancing on pcs… We’ll have bootlocked pcs in no time

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 day ago

      Its so dumb.

      It is not dumb, it is a smart business move that can only be made by a monopoly.

      They literally just settled with FTC and now they got blank check to fuck the plebs.

      It will get so much worse.

    • BurgerBaron@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      All the “Western” Empires are in decline. A lot of Europe, Australia, Canada, USA are all doing this shit at the same time clearly in cooperation with one another for anti privacy.

      The corporations meanwhile want their increasingly walled in gardens and diseased governments won’t stop them as long as they get their back doors and data mines.

      edit:

      Reminded me of something. I was watching one of the few FuriOS reviews on YouTube, and the guy happened to be Australian. He took a moment to mention that he couldn’t use the phone at all on specific mobile service providers because they only allowed white-listed pre-approved hardware.

      That’s pretty sickening.

        • benignintervention@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          Right? I put in a complaint from the system feedback tool, but I don’t expect a response. Between the way Google is roping off Android and killing dependent open source OS’s, and my relative lack of money, I’m only seeing privacy options dwindle

  • HexesofVexes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    1 day ago

    "Google, however, has decided anonymity is too risky. "

    The rest of the sane universe appear to be deciding Google is too risky.

    • Kairos@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      The cognitive dissonance with saying that the current state of Android is “too risky” without giving a single example of why it supposedly is.

  • brax@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    1 day ago

    They should rebrand it to aOS since it’s quickly becoming just as shit trash as iOS. I wonder how many people will jump ship to iOS where they still get a shitty OS but with some modicum of privacy OOTB as an added bonus

    My next phone is going to be as basic as possible and I’ll have to start carrying a laptop with me everywhere again.

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      A lot already have actually, writing was on the wall back when they dropped the version names which was also around the time a lot of the original Android hardware OEMs gave in which left us with carriers giving you the option between Samsung, Google, and Motorola.

      Then they abused Trump’s first term to ban Huawei for spyware since it was competing too well.

      The frontend UI sucks, the backend ART sucks, the process pausing system can’t hold most of your app views because reasons, Samsung removed OEM unlocking, Google has a stranglehold on decade old RCS with only google messages supporting such a protocol (wtf???), AOSP is functionally dead, Gapps has been eating the left side of your homepage for years, etc etc.

      I’m thinking about getting some handheld and making it into a PDA, like those upcoming DS-like consoles, and then maybe just get a pocket modem for phone/internet.

  • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    if only…

    As part of this so-called improved verification, Google should also be held liable for any damages caused by malicious applications.

    but no, regulators won’t do shit and they’ll have the cake and eat it too

    governments are becoming the puppets of big tech, in 50 years we’ll have night city IRL

  • katy ✨@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    i hope this shit gets hacked and cracked to allow the install of any apk so quickly.

    guess i aint upgrading anymore. congrats google you made your own os less safe

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This won’t stop anything

      I still use a phone that hasn’t received ota security or play security updates in 4 years.

      Yet, they still installed - without notice or consent - safety core (to rescue me from naughty text messages) to scan my images.

      Funny how they can rapeload apps onto my devices without my consent that work on 3 generations old hardware/os but they can’t update the security and they want everyone else to register to be able to provide foss apps to people for free.

    • somerandomperson@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      also remove com.wssyncmldm to forcibly prevent your phone from updating

      CAREFUL: when you reset, android updates itself to the newest version.

    • DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      23 hours ago

      I have 2 cheap options I could recommend for Custom ROMS:

      1. Moto G 5G 2024 $140 runs Lineage OS (I have this)
      2. CMF Phone 1 $290 runs e/OS, has OLED display, overall a better phone than the cheap moto.

      I’m not sure about “Linux” atm, there are still more apps for Custom Roms than you’d find for Linux that’s optimized for mobile use.

  • Einar@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    Just when I thought that I cannot possibly hate Google even more, I see D. Veloper.