• ayyy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    9 days ago

    At the top you can see the disused Alameda Naval Air Base runway, which is where the MythBusters filmed a lot of their antics.

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    9 days ago

    The photo must be around 8 years old.

    Fun fact: on the top left corner is a partial segment of the old Bay Bridge that was damaged during the Loma Prieta 1989 earthquake. They built a whole new span (the white section next to it). To get rid of the old concrete underwater pylons, they blew them all up underwater. Here’s a video of the implosion of the last two:

    https://blog.bayareametro.gov/posts/final-implosion-old-bay-bridge

    • NannerBanner@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 days ago

      Had the exact same thought. My visit to san fran was hilarious, because looking across the bay, you could see the sunshine on the north side, while the south was blanketed in light mist and fog. Our brief visit to the north side to see the muir woods was the exact opposite: sitting in sunshine while looking at a dreary, shrouded place across the water.

    • CelloMike@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 days ago

      I think it’s the original eastern span, midway through being demolished after the present one was finished in 2013

      • P1k1e@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 days ago

        Indeed, this photos pretty old. Haven’t seen the bay that blue in a looooooong time. It’s more of a dirty brown all the time now

  • hobovision@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 days ago

    This perspective is extra trippy because the port of Oakland and Naval Air Station Alameda are both so incomprehensibly huge on a human scale. You have an awareness and feeling for how big a city and skyscrapers are, so to see them in this perspective get made to look so small and so close to these expanses of concrete is mind bending.

    • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Meh, it was mostly just sand dunes, at least for San Francisco. There’s probably more trees there now then before it was developed. Also San Francisco probably has the most natural area surrounding it then any other major city in the US, since most of the area around it is either mountains or water which you can’t build on, that’s also why it’s so dense.

        • Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Unironnically yes, conservation wise skyscrapers are the best way for people to live. Squeezing people onto the smallest footprint possible per person is the best way to keep spaces natural, besides killing large chunks of the human population…

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    I first thought this pic was showing flooding or higher water levels. Nice overview shot.

    • egrets@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s satellite imagery, yes, but from an oblique (high off-nadir) angle. The imagery is from DigitalGlobe, who are now Maxar.