cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/59424100

German Chancellor Friedrich Merz has called for an end to widespread anonymity on the internet, saying users should post under their real names.

  • Drunk & Root@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    i fail to see the benefits to this for example if someone makes a post asking for help in the linux community an two people reply with same answers that work itd make no difference if one person that answerd is richard stalman or some random john doe

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Which would be a nice idea, if it wasn’t for the fact that the second that this happens, nobody will be able to freely speak any truth at all, because governments will jump on it to restrict speech more and more and more and something tells me that fuckface McNazi knows this.

    See what I did there? If I had to post under my real name, I would not have called him that.

    Free speech depends on anonymity

  • Saprophyte@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Louis Rossman just did a video on this very topic. He had a hot take on it, but it’s about the double edged sword of Internet anonymity in his formative years.

  • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    2 days ago

    I propose that all politicians must have cameras installed and streamed 24/7 in any spaces they regularly occupy. This includes offices, private homes, and even bathrooms. These spaces must have enough cameras that there are no blind spots within the rooms. Let’s make every politician live in a very literal manifestation of 1984. Don’t want to have the whole world watch you take a crap? Don’t run for office.

    • grandel@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      As soon as any politician critisises this idea, tell them there is nothing to worry about if you have nothing to hide.

    • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 days ago

      Merz criticized defenders of online anonymity, saying they are “often people who, from the shadows of anonymity, demand the greatest possible transparency from others.”

      Dude is non-comprehending and very offended to hear it

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    2 days ago

    Merz is in his 70s. He is not the most gifted politician. One nickname given to him by a journalist is “the unavoidable” in reference to him having no good competition for leadership in his party after a perceived century of Angela Merkel in charge who had successfully sidelined him. For a reason, it seems.

    He is very good at dropping shit like this in the media and then having it walked back or watered down. I do not see this idea getting a majority in the country where Google street view is useless because people rebelled against having the public facing side of their buildings photographed for easier navigation. And I can see a few arguments that would occupy the supreme court for a decade, were this to become law.

    • 0x0@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      where Google street view is useless because people rebelled against having the public facing side of their buildings photographed for easier navigation.

      Do elaborate.

        • 0x0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Has people’s view of Street View changed since then or has the German desire for privacy evolved? My money is on the latter,

          Or it’s that fish statistics analogy, newer generations don’t really feel their ancestors’ pains… but it’s too soon for that.

  • Lumidaub@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    2 days ago

    UK: hey, could people who use VPNs please tell us who they are exactly so we know they’re not circumventing this other law? … No? Because excellent reasons? … Oh…

    Merz: vee don’t like not knowing ze name of ze person who is calling us 1 Pimmel. it is vital vee know vat everybody is doing at all times on zis new sing, zis new land vee haff just discovered. because reasons.

    • eleitl@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Some governments (like Russia) have deployed behaviour (i.e. not just DPI) based VPN detection which reliably kills VPN sessions, however these are wrapped. I am currently not aware of a way to circumvent this. Presumably, this will require camouflaging as a user browser session.

      • Lumidaub@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Ze German nation can no longer afford zis Lifestyle-Nichtpimmeling. Everybody vill need to pimmel 120 hours a week at least and until age 85 if vee vant to preserve our prosperity.

  • fierysparrow89@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I wonder why such discussions are always framed as an all or nothing propositions. Zero knowledge systems are a decades old invention. Just very briefly: based on some ID a site issues cryptographycally signed tokens claiming some fact, e.g. the requester being an actual real person, adulthood, etc. Such a token could be presented by an otherwise anonymous user to a 2nd site with their own signature as proof of said property in order to consume their service. Tokens could even be single use.

    A requirement to prove someone is, in fact, a human is not unreasonable. Banning bots or bad actors could be a solution to a lot of the problems on social media etc…

    There is naturally a major shortcoming of this scheme, authoritarians could not track people…

    • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Zero knowledge systems

      I like this idea, it’s very interesting. Yet I always end up wondering how it could go sideways.

      A one time token (as in per message) seems onerous. A multi use token attesting “this is a human” could be sold to a bad actor using it to allow non-humans to masquerade as humans. We already see something like that on big social media where human accounts are sold to troll farms.

      • osanna@thebrainbin.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        2 days ago

        the 90s internet was so much better. I want the 90d internet back. even if it did take a week to download a movie

        • agentTeiko@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          The 90s internet is still here the web is just gone. Tildeverse, Gemini, BBS, Muds and IRC are still around. Its smaller but so was 90s internet but its still a lot of fun in the hidden corners of the net.

          • FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 days ago

            A Gemini reference in the wild!

            I looked a couple years ago. Briefly toyed with it, made a page or two. I like the ethos, and am about 99% on board. I only wish it had inline images. I feel like that omission alone would greatly hurt its adoption and relegate it to not just niche, but super-ultra-niche.