• mcv@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    104
    ·
    1 day ago

    Do they have any evidence that F-droid serves more malware than Play Store?

    • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      76
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was curious of the same a few days back, and my research couldn’t find a single instance of malware being distributed by the F-Droid store.

    • notarobot@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      According to them, when they added a similar registration process and requirements for the playstore they saw a SIGNIFICANT drop on malware.

      • JackbyDev@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I don’t find that shocking, and to be honest, I don’t really see too much of a problem with forcing people to give that information to be on the play store. But to let people make programs that run on the hardware at all is crazy. Forbidding third party app stores is the most anti competitive bullshit ever.

    • Mwa@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Since they force everything to be open source and i think has strict rules, no

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        1 day ago
        1. Write an open source malware
        2. Freely publish it everywhere because everyone assumes someone checked it, because it’s open source, you know?
        3. ???
        4. Profit
        • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          That’s the thing though if it’s open source and 99.9% don’t check that 0.1% checking it will be enough.

          • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            The trouble with smaller open source software is that there’s no 0.1% checking it. And from time to time a small projects becomes widely used and everyone assumes someone already checked it; it’s a widely used open source software, after all.

            • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I think most early users do check further than open source licenses. It’s possible they’ll add things later, but if they add after it has enough users we have significant number of users to have some people check. And if the user base is small then they’re probably more involved, or are reading/modifying code for their use cases.

              Of course it’s not foolproof, but it has worked for a long time because of things like that

          • Rooster326@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            By definition in order to have . 1% then the sample size must be greater than 1,000. The vast majority of open source projects will not get to this level.

            • thevoidzero@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              12 hours ago

              I think for a open source projects with such a low number of users, the first few users will definitely look further than “it’s open source”.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    129
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Giant corporations, like billionaires, pivot to trying to control the rest of us when they get too big. Google/Alphabet is not exempt. I remember when their motto was “Don’t be evil.” Now they want to control what I can install on the personal devices I bought…

    • OneOrTheOtherDontAskMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      1 day ago

      Essentially saying we’ll just ‘install’ piracy, as FitGirl is a major player in the piracy scene (as far as games go, no clue if they do other things).

      Unless I’m wrong and Fitgirl now has repacks for major android/iOS apps that can be utilized through an existing app interface.

      • vodka@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        66
        ·
        1 day ago

        And also it’s very probably a malicious app that does in fact not give you any pirated games.

        Probably adware at best. Wouldn’t doubt it also just sends you to non-play apk downloads of malware

        • x00z@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          The thumbnail says “unofficial” and malicious apps tend to try and trick you into thinking it’s official. So I’m not sure it’s malicious.

          • vodka@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            12 hours ago

            So them saying it’s unofficial makes you think it is more safe, since surely if it said official it’d be malicious?

            Sounds like putting unofficial there might just make even more people trust it then, good for a malicious app.

      • dan1101@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        1 day ago

        Not knowing that I assumed that Fitgirl was just some crappy gooner app that Google automatically promotes.

    • Venator@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      This was supposed to be taken down, but I guess its a proof how you can passively promote piracy on to the play store. This app shows a list of games that have been cracked & repacked

      1000000878

    • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      As others have said, Fitgirl is a major player in the games piracy scene. She doesn’t crack the games, but she does repack cracked games (compresses them in clever ways). It’s quite common for people to impersonate her or her site to try to fool people into downloading malware. This seems to be another one of those.

      She warns against this quite frequently. From her faq, for example:

      "Q: Do you have a Facebook page? A: I didn’t, don’t and won’t have a Facebook page. The same applies to Twitter, Instagram, whatever else. This site is the only official FitGirl Repacks source. If you happen to come here from “Facebook FitGirl Page” – you’ve been fooled by an imposter. "

      (Note: this comment is not an endorsement of games piracy, and this community is not the appropriate venue for discussions of that nature. Anyone interested should go to relevant communities like the ones hosted on the db0 Lemmy instance )