That was me, and my point was that we already had a suitable, regulated, and relatively safe system in place, ie taxis, so there’s no need for innovation that will needlessly endanger people.

You know what the first thing I think whenever I see a guy driving a large truck?

I don’t celebrate Christmas. Neither as a religious holiday nor a secular holiday.

Honestly, I don’t know how you people do it. Aside from the social aspect which would kill me, how do you all just have hundreds of extra dollars every year to buy stuff for people, like… regardless if they need or want something? It baffles me, to be honest. The whole culture for 1/4 of the year in this country just baffles me.

I don’t know who that is or what’s going on, but I would probably have the same expression on my face if I was about to do that to Jake Paul

Or, we managed to create a society where people are upset about new, unregulated, and, according to the article in question, potentially dangerous technology being implemented with little regard to the public good.

The built in Steam Proton version, yes. I’m currently using 9.0

Keep in mind that without anticheat you can’t get into the official servers. I host my own

Until it’s multiple self driving cars getting stuck in that intersection

Yea, so what was wrong with Taxis anyway? At least we regulated those

Is it brown people? It’s brown people, isn’t it?

The whole reason I use Linux is to shit myself and catch fire.

Fucking up is part of the fun. Y’all remember when computers used to be fun?

I dunno man, I play Rust on Linux all the time.

Can’t do anticheat, but I would have disabled that anyway

And it will inexplicably have peas in it as well

Then they need to give all their money to the government

If I had an extra 300 tb I’d do it.

You could cut off your search around the time AI tracks started to appear. Not sure when that was, maybe 2023. You’d miss a lot of recent stuff, but you’d filter out a lot of spam too

The right to silence was born out of the religious persecution that was rife in Europe in the 16th and 17th century, where coerce confessions and forcing people to incriminate themselves, even if it was bullshit, was commonplace

I think that’s what he was talking about. His argument is that the Founders did things that could incriminate themselves to their old government, and there were no protections in place to shield them from, for instance, self incrimination. The ‘validity’ of the law, I think, isn’t particularly germane.

Billionaires simply cannot exist without their money coming from the exploitation of the “lower classes”

That scope will narrow as time passes.

Now it’s brown poor people. Soon it will be trans people. Maybe next brown rich people, or Muslims, or Socialists. Y’all know the poem.

They’ve already “declared” Antifa a terrorist group and fentanyl as a WMD, that’s all the justification previous republican presidents have needed for starting wars and civil terror campaigns.

I heard a lawyer argue something like this once in court, regarding the the fourth and fifth amendments:

These laws are not meant to protect the innocent, they are meant to protect criminals. The founding fathers who penned it were traitors and seditionists who fought a war against their own country. They wrote these laws so that guilty people would be able to avoid punishment if proper procedures aren’t followed, and certain rights aren’t upheld.

I’m not sure how much I agree with that, but it was definitely an interesting take.

I absolutely adore the old wild west landscape that was the old 8 bit micros. There were some really wacky things that were tried out, both from a technical aspect and a UX aspect

Shit man, take me back to the “,8,1” days