• FlowVoid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Just so it’s clear, each subject spent hours training their own AI to recognize words they intentionally produced as “inner voice”. At the end, each trained AI could only recognize those trained words, and only from their trainer.

    That’s quite a bit different than an AI that could recognize new words in a completely different person. I think that’s as unlikely as training ChatGPT using only English texts and then expecting it to understand Chinese.

    • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      Was there any reported reduction in training time needed for subsequent words?

      Just getting a computer to understand anything from the implanted wires is progress, but it’s “spend hours training for each single word” we’re still at a 1970s scifi level of interaction.

      • FlowVoid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 days ago

        Normally words are all trained together, not one after another. Subjects do a monitored task that includes the entire vocabulary list, data from that task is processed extensively off-line, and finally subjects return to test all the vocabulary words.

    • masterofn001@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      First they built a silicon cube the size of a toaster with a little switch in it that responded to electrical signals.

      Now we have billions to trillions of those in our pockets.

      Etc.