This annoys me, because the APK is out, everything is enabled server side, so why not just roll it out and let people use it?

  • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.alOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    Honestly, this is a lazy AF comment. Yes Gadgetbridge exists, but what’s its relevance here? Does it implement Material 3 Expressive better than Fitbit? Does it have more functionality than Fitbit? Does it present the data as well as Fitbit? Does it implement AI features as well as Fitbit? Why are you mentioning a random AF app that doesn’t even support the number one device used by Fitbit users? Up the effort please!

    • Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Is it lazy? Yes. Is it useful? Also yes. You’re complaining about a service, this comment gives you a viable option to not use that service.

      • tinned_tomatoes@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        I like the idea of the tool very much but it doesn’t support Fitbit so I don’t know why it’s been posted here other than your typical Lemmy FOSS-leaning sentiment.

    • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I’ve learned about gadgetbridge from a lemmy post and because i care about privacy, i’m using it now.

      somebody may read that comment and choose their next device accordingly. If you’re complaining about Google, you have options