One fights the enemies of the state, the other serves and protects the people.
Lol wat… Police is the occupation force of the owner class used against peasants and to protect property of the owners.
People spouting this none sense of protection are delulu… That’s not what the law says and they sure don’t even* pretend like they protect the peasants nor serve them.
Truly the philosopher of our times. We get it, “ACAB” and you don’t see any other possible, and everybody else is a peasant. You should start your own anarchy instance so you can moderate and impose your authority to keep those darn tootin’ plebs and peasants away with your totally-not-authority-figure moderator and administrative pals. Gotrying to impose your personal social economic relations and charisma over pre-existing social order were “people are naturally good” except when (you say) they aren’tAnarchy!
I get your point and there is a partial truth to it. You seem to be missing the point of the writer’s efforts. To help you along, if I accept everything you said as unequivocally true, the writer’s point still stands. It’s not a refutation.
Lol wat… Police is the occupation force of the owner class used against peasants and to protect property of the owners.
People spouting this none sense of protection are delulu… That’s not what the law says and they sure don’t even* pretend like they protect the peasants nor serve them.
Ooooh, so edgy. Homeroom over yet?
That’s how the regime works, honey.
If you don’t understand that, it just means you are poorly educated and or a bootlicker, which is it?
Truly the philosopher of our times. We get it, “ACAB” and you don’t see any other possible, and everybody else is a peasant. You should start your own anarchy instance so you can moderate and impose your authority to keep those darn tootin’ plebs and peasants away with your totally-not-authority-figure moderator and administrative pals. Go
trying to impose your personal social economic relations and charisma over pre-existing social order were “people are naturally good” except when (you say) they aren’tAnarchy!?
I get your point and there is a partial truth to it. You seem to be missing the point of the writer’s efforts. To help you along, if I accept everything you said as unequivocally true, the writer’s point still stands. It’s not a refutation.
OP is talking in platitudes that mean nothing.
But sure in principle they do sound good.
But this language is used to keep the plebs complacent imho