• rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      One way, or another, that revenue stream will go to shit, they’re just doing a smash and grab while they can.

    • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      That’s what chasing infinite growth does to a corporation. Things are going to get way worse before the collapse.

    • brianpeiris@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      3.78 Trillion dollar market cap. You don’t get to that valuation by being generous to your customers. Apple is as capitalist as any of them. They’re just wrapped in shiny marketing. Now only if their fans understood that.

  • rafoix@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Apple App Store and Google Play stores have a market duopoly. They should be forced to forfeit all or most of its fees.

  • JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    To make this clear: Patreon is a platform mainly used by creators, artists, musicians to get a reliable income directly from their fans. Apple is trying to steal 30% of the income of our favorite artists.

    • scarabic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I really think this move blows and I wish they would reverse this decision and make an exception.

      However Tim Cook didn’t wake up one day and wonder how he could fuck creators. Apple takes a 30% cut of all app transactions. This is how they benefit from the enormous and highly successful app platform and ecosystem they created. It’s not pure evil to say “hey use this platform all you want but you must share some of what you make there with us.”

      It does suck that they won’t let creators off the hook though. This is like taxing rips.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        The platform is enormous and highly successful solely because it is a monopoly in the Apple ecosystem

        I guarantee you if other app stores were allowed on Apple devices, they would take significant market share with a far smaller cut of revenue

        • Limerance@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 days ago

          There are alternative App Stores in Europe for iOS. So far they haven’t been very successful, because of Apple‘s interference. They do exist and are growing.

      • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Honestly I wouldn’t touch Apple products with a bargepole. I dislike closed ecosystems

        • 4am@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          You’d rather be spied on constantly by the largest panopticon ever created, because they allow sideloading.

          Honestly this is voting for Trump over Kamala; we need a viable alternative. Why have they taken personal computing from us?

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Were being spied on regardless, better to choose the option that allows one to do the most with it. If I could throw together my own phone and run a Linux variant on then I fucken would, but as it phone hardware is ass and Linux mobile doesn’t exist for my phone.

            • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              You can’t logic people out of an emotional decision. The hatred of Apple runs deep.

              The obviousness of this is how Android users troll Apple discussions but Apple users don’t troll Android discussions.

              They have insanely strong opinions on what other’s choices that it borderline religious.

        • blazeknave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          I always end up with MacBooks after startups and love to have something I can just pick up and use whereas my PC is my command center. Most of my shit is web or local web services so just need a Mozilla terminal. Also, I can’t fathom buying one out of pocket. I’ve also never had an iPhone, it doesn’t make sense to my brain.

          • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            So…if you’re just using web stuff, you could probably save a heap by using a Chromebook. That’s what my wife’s personal laptop is and is perfect for web stuff (and has the option of Android apps too, like Mozilla). It’s not her only computer though.

            • blazeknave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              26 days ago

              Why the hell did you get so downvoted??? Yeah, that’s not a bad point in any way but recall my use case - never bought anything per se, just ended up with 😁

              • tabular@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                21 days ago

                Perhaps a Chromebook is not much better in terms of freedom than an Apple product? I heard they’re often e-waste in schools.

    • njordomir@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yeah, hopefully Patron doesn’t roll over and just removes the option to do it in iPhone. Taking away functionality will make Apple look bad, which they deserve.

  • Vogi@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    That’s how the system works. You don’t expect Walmart to not get a commission when you sell something at their store.

    30% is reasonable. DEAL WITH IT.

    Don’t like it? Make your own phone and platform.

    Opening up the comments on macrumors never disappoints me :)

  • FireWire400@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I hope Patreon will just switch off the ability to pay through the iOS app, along with a nice fuck you-message to Apple that pops up when you first open the app

    • lost_faith@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Last time this came up Patreon simply allowed the creators to charge the commission directly on top of the price for non apple users, or eat the 30% loss. So everyone not using iOS would pay, say, $5/month, iOS users would pay $5+30%. Hope they retain that option.

  • dan@upvote.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Why does Apple feel they deserve a 30% cut? In cases like this, Apple aren’t providing any value at all.

    • Apple aren’t providing the content - the creator is.
    • Apple aren’t providing a platform for the content - Patreon is.
    • Apple aren’t providing a platform for discovery - people aren’t finding Patreon creators solely via Apple products.

    Sure, Apple are providing a payments platform, but why do they deserve 10x what Stripe charges?

    • Flagstaff@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      It’s just platform-milking, just like Meetup.com’s latest antics; there isn’t deep analysis needed to everything, haha. “Capitalism” is totally a legitimate answer despite being just one word.

      • Munkisquisher@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        Meetup is now owned by Bending Spoons, who have also enshittified wetransfer, Evernote, eventbrite, AOL, vimeo. They buy decent products that never exploded to ipo status, fire everyone and milk the rest for whatever they can charge.

        • Flagstaff@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          23 days ago

          No, but I used to be more active until I saw that they started to increasingly prevent you from talking to other participants, and even seeing who other people are (can’t even tell gender or anything) unless you paid for their higher tier. I literally saw it get added out of the blue after years of no such restrictions, and they’ve only dug deeper and deeper. I couldn’t even connect with someone with whom I met just because I didn’t attempt to get their number immediately on the spot.

          • JamieDub86@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            23 days ago

            Thank you. I havent used meetup in 10 or so years. Cant remember paid features then. People also had a profile, with a picture, so as you could see interests and groups they were part of, there was also a message board for the group and messaging members wasnt an issue. Sad to see what its become.

            • Flagstaff@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              22 days ago

              Yeah, we can no longer msg other participants without paying. I guess they’ve picked up on it having dating potential since it has a “Single” designation so it may get added to Match’s ever-growing portfolio down the years, haha.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      They provide the payment system. They also mandate it.

      If you subscribe on the website you don’t have to pay the extra. It’s only for subscriptions initiated via the app

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          Yeah. But why would you use the app? I personally didn’t know there even was an app.

          • tabular@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            Maybe it offers something better than on whatever web browser Apple mandates, or maybe no reason but user preference.

            • Leon@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              There’s no way that the Patreon app isn’t more than a dolled up web view. If people make stupid decisions I guess the fallout is on them.

              • tabular@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                21 days ago

                Sadly the fallout is usually on everyone - eventually companies will copy a shady practice as it’s been shown they can get away with it… until no other option for the users exists. It falls on the technologically literate to call out when others are being mistreated or they can suffer too.