Fedora (users?)
(And yes, I know that’s technically a trilby, shut up)
You’d think but here’s a picture of a Fedora user.
Hey now, thats not fair…
My chair is black, too.
I don’t get it (Jesus, What have I started ?)
A lot of arch users are kids fucking with thinkpads ricing up their systems and putting anime wallppapers while not doing anything serious.
Ubuntu is commonly used by researchers and hardware developers who don’t really care about distro as long as it’s linux. The amount of times I saw people use the entire distro with default gnome skin just to launch a terminal to run their black hole simulation, the crypto cracker or some centrifuge control script… I myself am neither but ubuntu has been my go to as well since I usually don’t have time to screw with archinstall, so I just use ubuntu as good starting point and then tweak the internals as I go.
I feel like I’m the odd person out, using Arch like most people use Windows. I play games, do taxes, shop online, and do very minimal customizing, mostly just in KDE settings.
It’s a shockingly stable system for how “bleeding edge” it is.
Wait, that’s not what you’re supposed to do?
No you’re supposed to rice the hell out of your Arch install, put an anime girl wallpaper, some form of neofetch replacement (RIP), and post screenshots about it while wearing programmer socks and loudly telling people how good arch is and how much their distro sucks.
Then complain about how you broke it and can’t fix it because you used
archinstall
thereby skipping the setup and recovery lessons, and didn’t read the wiki before updating.
Arch users have the most whacky, customized computers you can find. Meanwhile arch itself is a small distro with very little features out the box.
Ubuntu as a distro has tons of features out the box but ubuntu users generally just keep the default without adding or using any features.
I think a statistic about how much of your userbase keeps the default config could be a testament to how good your OS is
Arch is hard to install, hard to configure, and hard to use, because it requires cryptic commandline knowledge at every step.
People who use Arch generally know very well what they are doing, so their system works with no issues, which they never forget to mention in every conversation.
Ubuntu is a novice-friendly Linux distribution, but since the majority of it’s users are novices or Windows 11 refugees, they generate a lot of complaints on forums.
Arch being hard to install and configure hasn’t really been true since
archinstall
matured enough for regular use.Especially not since EndeavorOS.
Endeavour is nice, I use it on my main PC because some of their util scripts are nice to have. Arch itself just is not much harder to install these days with the current installer.
Kali users
Hey, some of us are nyarch users - that’s rainbow on both sides
Some people put so much time and energy in this kind of stuff. Imagine we could harvest this level of motivation from everyone and put it at the service of the sustainable transition, we would have stopped global warming at the +1.5⁰C mark.
I don’t think it’s guaranteed we’d do better with global warming, but lack of creative just-for-fun projects would sure make it a colder place.
This is why I use Fedora
Instantly works, and I never need to dedicate hours to fixing stuff when something breaks
I mean, the pictures don’t even hint on “broken things” And I don’t care what operating system you use, every single one has the capability to break.
Ubuntu users here wanted to go Debian, but also want to live in the current world.
Kubuntu with
--minimal-install
(nosnap
fuckery) has been my unironic “S-Tier” computing experience in life.Kubuntu slaps