• 0 Posts
  • 27 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: March 19th, 2024

help-circle
  • Entirely possible, I know they have commented before on not wanting to do it.

    Which I kind of get if you’re parsing metadata, you’d have to create a whole new method for parse and view which can be a pain. Though I’d hardly call it evil myself since its how I sort too.

    I’d agree on having to think and duplicates are possible, but that’s possible in so many scenarios.

    shrug

    Either way metadata I think is important, but ive been a pain about metadata since the 90s (because burning CDs and having the actual track info was awesome).



  • Personally I just run both.

    Navidrome is what I would call the daily driver, but since its just a share that JF can also see, for TV playback its JF just like you.

    But I’m also a stickler for metadata so I don’t often run into issues. When I do see something come up thats not right, I correct manually. Which wasn’t happening very often until lidarr had the metadata issue with musicbrainz, though the past few months its been a manual effort.












  • I’m just saying the percentage of those who may have been willing to pay is small enough to be irrelevant in the for-profit release perspective.

    Netflix (when it first started streaming) and Steam (when sales included good older stuff for wildly cheap) showed that piracy is more of a service problem than anything else. A recent article called out the content problems (partial content, a few seasons behind a separate paywall, ads in the middle of playback, etc) a are directly related to an increase in piracy.

    So my opinions on copyright aside - a clear model to a happy consumer is an affordable price without all the enshittification going on. People also dont like “buying” content that later disappears because of licensing changes.

    So I’d put it squarely in the “their own damn fault” territory, and I’m glad when judges say “no” to them. I’ll take whatever positives I can get.