Tbh I’m not sure where the misunderstanding even comes from. With what have I hinted that?
I said they (Israel) would not have (advanced) economy or military power without the USA.
(I even especially mentioned USA’s ‘political support’.)
I think that obviously very much covers the possibility of any extensive military campaigning.
Even with USA actions after WWII, without constant (and very sus) protections, direct & indirect support Israel would have been an enclave by the 70s.
But the USA wants to have a platform for their nuclear weapons & military logistics in that region.
Tbh I’m not sure where the misunderstanding even comes from. With what have I hinted that?
I said they (Israel) would not have (advanced) economy or military power without the USA.
(I even especially mentioned USA’s ‘political support’.)
I think that obviously very much covers the possibility of any extensive military campaigning.
Even with USA actions after WWII, without constant (and very sus) protections, direct & indirect support Israel would have been an enclave by the 70s.
But the USA wants to have a platform for their nuclear weapons & military logistics in that region.
The misunderestsnding is that you said that it has nothing to do with the usa but all your next comment shows that is has to do with the it
Ohh, is by any chance this what you meant?
I didn’t write that.
I just agreed with you, but you took that rather offensively.
Would you point out where I said that?
Sorry about that