Saying that the topic of “caring about transgender and LGBT issues” is promoted by the bourgeois is clearly not intended to indicate they respect those communities concerns.
The “men in women’s sports” thing is just straight up transphobic, sexist misinformation.
It shouldn’t need to be explained, but using “trans” as a label to attack a woman to delegitimize her sporting victory is just a hot mess of issues.
There is absolutely scientific consensus. Trans females do not perform as physically as well as males. It is pure fragile masculinity (read weak baby bitch boi) behavior to hate on trans people in sports.
Trans females do not perform as physically as well as males
When under hormonal treatment only, and that wasn’t my point anyways. I was obviously comparing transgender women vs cisgender women, and there’s no consensus on this. If you do have one I would be glad to check
And don’t throw a random worthless study, like something with a jokingly low sample size
Instead of insulting, use facts and logic. Else it’s just pathetic debate manipulation
Saying that the topic of “caring about transgender and LGBT issues” is promoted by the bourgeois is clearly not intended to indicate they respect those communities concerns.
The “men in women’s sports” thing is just straight up transphobic, sexist misinformation.
It shouldn’t need to be explained, but using “trans” as a label to attack a woman to delegitimize her sporting victory is just a hot mess of issues.
Eh, yes and no
The subject is still debated, and there’s no clear scientific consensus, even though the lemmy community will make you believe so
There is absolutely scientific consensus. Trans females do not perform as physically as well as males. It is pure fragile masculinity (read weak baby bitch boi) behavior to hate on trans people in sports.
Why do you support weak baby bitches?
When under hormonal treatment only, and that wasn’t my point anyways. I was obviously comparing transgender women vs cisgender women, and there’s no consensus on this. If you do have one I would be glad to check
And don’t throw a random worthless study, like something with a jokingly low sample size
Instead of insulting, use facts and logic. Else it’s just pathetic debate manipulation