• lulztard@feddit.orgEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    Can someone explain to someone out of the loop what’s transphobic about his post?

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      Saying that the topic of “caring about transgender and LGBT issues” is promoted by the bourgeois is clearly not intended to indicate they respect those communities concerns.

      The “men in women’s sports” thing is just straight up transphobic, sexist misinformation.
      It shouldn’t need to be explained, but using “trans” as a label to attack a woman to delegitimize her sporting victory is just a hot mess of issues.

      • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frEnglish
        1·
        2 months ago

        The “men in women’s sports” thing is just straight up transphobic, sexist misinformation.

        Eh, yes and no

        The subject is still debated, and there’s no clear scientific consensus, even though the lemmy community will make you believe so

        • MotoAsh@lemmy.worldEnglish
          01·
          2 months ago

          There is absolutely scientific consensus. Trans females do not perform as physically as well as males. It is pure fragile masculinity (read weak baby bitch boi) behavior to hate on trans people in sports.

          Why do you support weak baby bitches?

          • FireIced@lemmy.super.ynh.frEnglish
            1·
            2 months ago

            Trans females do not perform as physically as well as males

            When under hormonal treatment only, and that wasn’t my point anyways. I was obviously comparing transgender women vs cisgender women, and there’s no consensus on this. If you do have one I would be glad to check

            And don’t throw a random worthless study, like something with a jokingly low sample size

            Instead of insulting, use facts and logic. Else it’s just pathetic debate manipulation