Crap, I’m in the process of setting up a headless Ubuntu server on my desktop to eek the maximum amount of CPU/GPU/RAM out of it for AI stuff and was planning on controlling it via my laptop.

I don’t particularly care about privacy on that desktop, but would my ignorance of security hardening open me up to rogue hackers using my machine for their own purposes if I were to set it up so I could control it remotely (not just hardwired)?

I’m willing to be the dumbest member of this community. But on the off chance anyone else doesn’t understand what problem Nginx Proxy Manager solves:

Many ISPs only allow traffic on ports 80 and 443. But distinct from a website where all pages are part of a single process, separate web apps (photos, blogs, calendar, etc) are all made by different people and need their own port.

Nginx Proxy Manager can therefore be the only thing listening at ports 80/443 and then can seamlessly forward the user to the correct port using HTTPS.

Smart people: constructive critiques are welcomed.

OP hasn’t heard about AI

I’m setting up a headless Ubuntu server on my beefy home desktop and all my other portable devices will just talk to it via ssh.

Not sure if the boiling water weakens the glass’s integrity or not, but I’ve broken two of these glass ones. Plastic is outright. Have had a full-metal interior electric kettle since it got cold this season and it’s fantastic.

Edit: The gooseneck ones as in OP’s post are overpriced imho.

I don’t like how broad Lemmy assumes default interests are, though then again showing everyone the average interests may statistically be the best initialization point.

Every time I’m shown a community I’m totally uninterested I make sure to go in and block it from my feed. Likewise with aggressive or otherwise pathological users. It gets better.

My two cents is that more users oughta establish new communities when they find the absence of one. Even if they don’t have the time to devote for fully moderating it, as people join the responsibilities can be allocated among the early adopters. Especially those with strong political and moral backgrounds (to mitigate abuses of power like those infamously cultivated at Reddit).

Since going extinct, more like glyptodon’t.

Libertarians of any stripe love their macroeconomics despite its independence of how society as a whole is doing.

They’d probably think they’re all smart and respond, “0…? Of course”

Sorry I don’t follow, what does he say about any criticism of capitalism? Does he believe that any competing idea constitutes a conspiracy?

Example?

A realistic memory (set to music) of Windows technologies

The market has determined the gender stereotypes that are most profitable and insecure people increasingly take on those qualities as parts of their personality.

All other interests are niche and require someone to establish a special interest club to attract like-minded folks.

If anyone’s interested, languages follow similar differentiation patterns as species in evolution. Ways this occurs include: allopatric (barrier separates past equivalents), peripatric (migration), and sympatric (subcultures), etc.

It’s the same reason Matthew Rhys can do a spot-on American accent despite having an outrageous Welsh accent irl: people are more likely to grow up on the media of more mainstream languge so it becomes the lingua franca. (love Rhys to clarify)

You can set connections between folders to be one-directional. That way after I send stuff to my intended device I wipe it from the source device and it stays where it was intended to go.

PsychoWiz once told me that the scientific names of organisms are just letters and sounds, and have no bearing on physical traits or where the species was found. They hate linguistics and call it witchcraft.

Since when has competition ever spurred innovation? Pff

Descriptive language grammar >> prescriptive language grammar