Nothing against you, OP. I just don’t enjoy these comics. They’re telling me things I already knew and they’re not particularly funny while doing it.
If being relatable was the only thing you need to tell a joke, then “how about that airplane food?” wouldn’t have become the stand-in joke for a “bad comedian”.
Luckily I never claimed that I did. And those “one-dude-did-it-all-in-a-week” games are getting eclipsed by things people churn out in a 48 game jam, what’s you’re point?
I can tell you’re just an ornery arse, so I’m gonna dip.
Plus, making games is so much easier that the industry is cranking out more games than ever. Even if the proportion of stinkers stays constant, someone with bad statistics knowledge and an obsession with the negative would notice an increased number of bad games.
Ok, but that’s still weird in my mind. That’s not raw, that’s preserved.
Black is usually the better choice for that. It’d dry dark.
Whoa, what the hell. How are you throwing Totalbiscuit and the entirety of GamerGate’s scandals and social furor into the same, offhand pile?
John was strongly opinionated and enjoyed being a bit of a smug ass as his online persona, but he was mainly about making games more accessible by advocating for more, and more inclusive, settings for all the games he played.
This should be taken as evidence they’ve been training off the entire internet.
Fourth panel should just be him dead. I’d have already pulled my hand out
Yeah, a lot of these comics feel more like PSAs for teens than comics. There’s no wordplay, visual humor, nothing.
Just one character setting up an ideological teeball for another character to crack a debate homerun off of.
Really?
Maybe it’s linguistic continuity to show they are the same person from before the visor was removed. Or…
Maybe women can just say “bro”.
Edit: I’m not calling you a sexist or anything, but it’s a weird deduction to make based on very subjective/anecdotal “evidence”. I’ve interacted with a lot of women online they use “bro” pretty freely.
No, no, you’re cooking. I can see that interpretation.
Or even just an overexaggerated part of the female body, to signify where the stereotypical man focuses his attention.
The way it is now just sorta says “the male gaze is ‘guys seeing women’”? Which…okay?
Yeah, I know. It’s just this one broke the camel’s back, so to speak, and I felt compelled to comment.