Violent action has become more and more likely to fail and lead to dictatorship in the modern world. Where as nonviolent action has continued to be more successful. I’m not saying peaceful protest though, specifically nonviolent action.

I highly recommend reading the book “This Is an Uprising: How Nonviolent Revolt Is Shaping the Twenty-First Century” if you’re interested.

Steven Miller calling the no kings protest the “I hate america rally” was insane because it was a perfect opposite of one of the movements the book focuses on.

The optor movement in serbia that succeeded had a mass movement with the slogan “resistance, because I love serbia”

Sounds to me like he’s read the book as well and is trying to invert it’s lessons.

Can you share the info on the Texas stuff? I had missed that.

Don’t have a good answer though

I highly recommend reading “This Is an Uprising: How Nonviolent Revolt Is Shaping the Twenty-First Century”

Not x. Not y. Z.

It wasn’t that --em dash–it’s this.

It loves grouping of 3s

Those are just the ones I noticed immediately again when skimming it, there was a lot more I noticed when I originally read it. I read it aloud to my wife while cooking the first time and we were both laughing about how obviously chatjipity it was lol.

Unfortunately, the data shows violent uprisings almost always fail.

We need nonviolent action.

Notice I didnt say peaceful.

Accurate but ironically written by chatgpt

I wouldn’t be able to do it justice, but it’s a short read.

https://share.google/133rOWEaEnNADd7Gn

I found the book another now very insightful and it kind of touches on this