Thank you for clarifying. It does align more with the way I would use LLM in my day to day work then, which is quite reassuring.

Even if it doesn’t work for me, I can still see the advantage of using AI assistant in those context. In the end, as long as you are doing the work required, the tools you use don’t really matters!

Maybe I should try it to understand, but to me, this kind of feel like it would produce code that would not follow the company standards, code that will be harder to debug since the dev have little to no idea on how it work and code that is overall of less quality than the code produce by a dev that doesn’t use AI.

And I would not trust those unit tests, since how can you be sure if they test the correct thing, if you never made them fail in the first place. A unit test that passes right away is not a test you should rely on.

Don’t take it the wrong way, but if Claude write all of your code, doesn’t that make you more of a product owner than a dev ?