Let me try again. I also try not to be rude, but a one word “huh?” answer rubbed me the wrong way. Clean slate is fine by me.
Top Level Comment: “[I found a use for AI.]” My response: “[Although it sounds like you’re responding to what OP said, that doesn’t really contradict OP since they never claimed it has no uses. They are objecting to AI on different grounds entirely.]”
I take issue with this bit:
that doesn’t really contradict OP since they never claimed it has no uses.
Which is the source of your “forest for the trees” comment.
I don’t think that a reasonable person can, based on the reading of the OPs “AI is everywhere and evil” post, presume to say that the OP believed there are good uses for AI. I will probably edit this post for your particular wording. Since in voyager I can’t simultaneously reply and look at the comment chain.
Edit: having read the rant now several times, and in no way is it ever implied in any way that there’s anything good about AI. Sure, there’s no phrase that you said, or that OP says, that imply that it’s explicitly NOT useful. That, however, I would say is the “miss the forest for the trees” part. It strikes me as totally justifiable to say “I have found some uses for AI” in light of a blanket negative OP post. I don’t think the guy you initially replied to is missing anything.
Hopefully that fully articulates my position.
I also apologize.
I guess we have to agree to disagree and agree to agree? LLM design happens to be my area of work for the last 4 months or so and I tend to agree that it’s a hateful domain without much to offer. That said, my ability to do my job is extremely enabled by perplexity.ai. I think about 95% of regular people’s queries to generative AI of any kind is a waste of effort an active pursuit of brain atrophy, but there is definitely some upside.
I don’t think that sentiment is echoed by the original post. I also think that with the overwhelming number of anti/fuck ai posts it’s worth highlighting upside when there is upside. Last, I just don’t in any way think that someone who writes a full bore “ai is evil” post has left any space to discuss any sort of benefit. So that’s my main disagreement with you. I think “AI is stupid” is implied if there’s no single positive mention.
I can honestly say perplexity.ai has saved me hours of technical research debugging, and I’ve got a PhD in rocket science and Ive been programming since 2003. By and large it’s totally stupid, but if you know what you need and what good answers look and feel like, it’s hard to be like “AI BAD!” which is the majority perspective of this type of thread.