• 0 Posts
  • 24 Comments
Joined 23 days ago
cake
Cake day: November 1st, 2025

help-circle


  • I like this idea for a lot of reasons. The inclement weather one I see in the comments is definitely one of them.

    But it also puts me in mind of some of the clever ways I’ve seen posts and reflectors used to give the impression (when say you’re driving at night and only see them out of the corner of your eye) of a person standing there, until you look at them properly and then they look exactly like what they are.

    There’s one in particular in a neighborhood where I used to live that to this day if I drive by it, my hindbrain says “HUMAN” and I really don’t understand why because the post looks nothing like a human when I look at it properly. It’s magic.


  • Yeah. I wasn’t sure it would work for your use case necessarily, but I did remember seeing that a version of the Walmart onn box was available in Europe, so I didn’t want to discount it altogether.

    Either way I do hope you find what you’re looking for and if I come across suggestions that might work I’ll try to post them here.















  • Sigh. This article is all over the place.

    The headline suggests that payment processors/AI companies/retailers are fighting about the collection of shopper data.

    AI obviously doesn’t collect the kind of data that would be useful to the retailers or even the payment processors. So it does stand to reason that the retailers would be a little miffed about “agentic AI” insinuating itself as the middle man between them and shoppers, effectively cutting them off from that data flow.

    But that’s not actually what’s happening. It seems like (potentially), the AI companies want to sell “agentic AI shopping” to the retailers and possibly payment processors? But these entities want information about the shoppers that the AI doesn’t collect and the quibble is over whether the AI can be made to collect that data?