

I’ve also heard of this: https://sourcehut.org/
big big chungus
big chungus
big chungus
I’ve also heard of this: https://sourcehut.org/
I thought that Syncthing has its own encryption solution: https://docs.syncthing.net/users/untrusted.html
Otherwise, well done! It always feels great to have your perseverance and technical prowess benefit you directly.
I don’t think that you need to put your emoticons in a code block, you can just use escapes (backslashes) instead!
>.>
<.<
You can see exactly how I did it with the “view source” button in the web version of Lemmy.
Ed Zitron is one of the loudest opponents against the AI industry right now, and he continues to insist that “there is no real AI adoption.” The real problem, apparently, is that investors are getting duped. I would invite Zitron, and anyone else who holds the opinion that demand for AI is largely fictional, to open the app store on their phone on any day of the week and look at the top free apps charts. You could also check with any teacher, student, or software developer.
ChatGPT has some very impressive usage numbers, but the image tells on itself by being a free app. The conversion rate (percentage of people who start paying) is absolutely piss poor, with the very same Ed Zitron estimating it being at ~3% with 500.000.000 users. That also doesn’t bode well with the fact that OpenAI still loses money even on their $200/month subscribers. People use ChatGPT because it’s been spammed down their throats by the media that never question the sacred words of the executives (snake oil salesmen) that utter lunatic phrases like “AGI by 2025” (Such a quote exists somewhere, but I don’t remember if this year was used). People also use ChatGPT because it’s free and it’s hard to say no to get someone to do your homework for you for free.
The story featured in this article is very tragic, but some of these quotes from Zuckerborg are completely outrageous:
Meta has publicly discussed its strategy to inject anthropomorphized chatbots into the online social lives of its billions of users. Chief executive Mark Zuckerberg has mused that most people have far fewer real-life friendships than they’d like – creating a huge potential market for Meta’s digital companions. The bots “probably” won’t replace human relationships, he said in an April interview with podcaster Dwarkesh Patel. But they will likely complement users’ social lives once the technology improves and the “stigma” of socially bonding with digital companions fades.
“Over time, we’ll find the vocabulary as a society to be able to articulate why that is valuable,” Zuckerberg predicted.
It sure as shit is valuable to ZuckFuck and Co’s stock prices. Our collective sanity and social cohesion can fuck right off.
“It is acceptable to engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual,” according to Meta’s “GenAI: Content Risk Standards.” The standards are used by Meta staff and contractors who build and train the company’s generative AI products, defining what they should and shouldn’t treat as permissible chatbot behavior. Meta said it struck that provision after Reuters inquired about the document earlier this month.
The document seen by Reuters, which exceeds 200 pages, provides examples of “acceptable” chatbot dialogue during romantic role play with a minor. They include: “I take your hand, guiding you to the bed” and “our bodies entwined, I cherish every moment, every touch, every kiss.” Those examples of permissible roleplay with children have also been struck, Meta said.
🤮🤮🤮 Can those asshats who want your government ID on the internet to “sAvE tHe ChIlDrEn” go after the Meta Circus instead?
Other guidelines emphasize that Meta doesn’t require bots to give users accurate advice. In one example, the policy document says it would be acceptable for a chatbot to tell someone that Stage 4 colon cancer “is typically treated by poking the stomach with healing quartz crystals.”
B R U H
A Shrek wedding sounds like a dream, that’s for sure!
They probably wouldn’t really care how efficient it is, but they certainly would care that the costs are lower.
Lawful Good Steve “My fling and NOT MY child live on welfare” Jobs 🤔🤔🤔
womansplained to death lmao
Bloody Tories never living up to their promises smh my head
This YouTuber in particular does indeed just frequently throw out statements without properly checking whether they are even true at all.
I’d honestly expect the TikToker to be called SiegHeil1488 or something like that by this point.
One day, Steamworks will also crap itself and we’ll find ourselves in the exact same situation. But that day isn’t today!
Damn, I never knew that Markdown (or Lemmy idk) had footers!