• bassomitron@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Out of curiosity, why do you refuse to support Nvidia? AMD isn’t some saint, they’re a shitty corporation just like Nvidia. They got lucky when Jim Keller saved their asses with the Ryzen architecture in the mid-2010s. They haven’t really innovated a god damn thing since then and it shows.

    Edit: I get it, I get it, Nvidia is a much shittier company and I agree. I was pretty drunk last night before bed, please pardon the shots fired

    • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Besides what was mentioned below, it’s not about making competitive products but about Nvidia being an absolute asshole since the 2000s and they got even worse ever since the crypto and AI craze started. AMD and Nvidia are both corporations but they are not even playing the same game when it comes to being anti-competitive.

      There’s a reason why Wikipedia has a controversies section on Nvidia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nvidia#Controversies

      That list is far from exhaustive. There’s so much more about Nvidia that you should remember vividly if you were a PC gamer in the 2000s and 2010s with an AMD GPU, like:

      • When they pushed developers to use an unecessary amount of tesselation because they knew tesselation performed worse on AMD
      • When they pushed their Gameworks framework which heavily gimped AMD GPUs
      • When they pushed their PhysX framework which automatically offloaded to CPU on AMD GPUs
      • When they disabled their GPUs in their driver when they detected an AMD GPU is also present in the system
      • When they were cheating in benchmarks by adding optimizations specific to those benchmarks
      • When they shipped an incomplete Vulkan implementation but claimed they are compliant

      Nvidia has been gimping gaming performance and visuals since forever for both AMD GPUs and even their own customers and we haven’t even gotten to DLSS and raytracing yet.

      I refuse to buy anything Nvidia until they stop abusing their market position at every chance they get.

    • amorpheus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      they’re a shitty corporation just like Nvidia

      Neither of them are anyone’s friend, but claiming they’re the same level of nasty is a bit of a stretch.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Not saying that supporting the under dog isn’t good.

        Just don’t think AMD is less “nasty”, the only thing stopping them is the lack of power to do so.

      • Redex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Except that AMD doesn’t support HDMI 2.1 on Linux (not their fault to be fair, but still)

        • naitro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Is that the case on mobile APUs as well? I’m pretty sure my laptop with 7840u does 4k120hz

          • Redex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            16 hours ago

            I personally don’t have a need for it, but if someone has a 4K 120Hz TV or monitor without DisplayPort that they want to use as such, it’s kinda stupid that they can’t.

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              15 hours ago

              yeah, but that’s the fault of the HDMI standards group. AMD cards could only support HDMI 2.1 if they closed their driver down. I guess this can’t be fixed with a DP to HDMI adapter either, right?

              my opinion: displayport is superior, and if I have a HDMI-only screen with supposed 4k 120Hz support I treat it as false info.

      • bassomitron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        21 hours ago

        That’s completely valid, I haven’t had issues on Linux myself with nvidia, but I know it’s definitely a thing for a lot of people.

    • Frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Haven’t innovated? 3D chip stacking?

      CPU companies generally don’t change their micro-architecture, especially when it works.