• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s why keywords are important. For instance I added the fact that if they continue in this course I will seek to de-Google my phones.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Like I said in another comment, unless they get tens of millions of actual unique-not-spam responses they will not even consider reconsidering. People aren’t going to de-google in any great numbers from this, because most of the people this will affect are already de-googled.

      • Lfrith@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Rather than degoogling telling them you will go to Apple and opt for apple services is likely the more powerful response, since that is what the regular person is more likely to do. If degoogled is used they’ll likely dismiss it assuming it is just one of those niche nerds. But an exodus to Apple is a threat that is more realistic.

        • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          But that makes no sense - they’ll go to someone who is even more restrictive in side loading?

          Google won’t reverse this because there’s no alternative for the relatively few people this will affect. They already don’t use Google things, and Apple don’t accomodate them. They’ve got them by the balls and they know it, which is why it’s all just empty threats even from people in here.