• MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    We actually kind of have the alternative to that as well. In Iraq the US took all members of the Baath party of Hussein. It was very clearly a horrible organization, which commited genocide and many other crimes, but doing so removed all sorts of people from power, which had usefull skills and kind of needed to be party members. For example when you built roads, you really need engineers in the government to check if that road is actually going to be built correctly. Even worse they through the secret service and military members into the same prison as islamic terrorists. So when the US left Iraq, those terrorists got access to people with a very particular set of skills.

    Really the only way to go about it, is to built up the alternative in the back, trial the worsed cases and keep the Nazis or whatever other evil group from gaining power.

    • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      That literally is what we did and it didnt work. Kill them. So they can never do it again. The Soviets were right.

      • MrMakabar@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Iraq did not collapse due to the Baath party members taking over. It collapsed due too few competent people in positions of power. That opened up the prisons and allowed the Baath party members to take over. Killing them would not have stopped Iraq from collapsing, when the US left.

        • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          22 minutes ago

          For whatever reason I thought you were talking about ww2 and the nazis. I must have not been paying enough attention scrolling the chain