• BassTurd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No it’s fact. Not voting supports the less good candidate 100% of the time in FPtP.

    And yes, non voters are more responsible for this than the DNC sending a shit message. If non voters and third party voted Kamala, we wouldn’t have a dictator in the White house right now. The DNC didn’t put him there, voters for Trump and non voters did.

    • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      No it’s fact. Not voting supports the less good candidate 100% of the time in FPtP.

      What are you talking about? It’s pretty rich to accuse others of lacking critical thinking and then come out with this. Someone who didn’t vote could have equally been someone who didn’t vote for trump. You mean “someone who was going to vote for the democrats but then didn’t”.

      The DNC purposefully threw the election. They are the ones with agency here. Each non voter might have gotten them 0.00001% closer to winning. They could have gotten themselves 100% closer.