• termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    I want GrapheneOS more than repairability, personally. I hope the Fairphone + GrapheneOS combination is possible some day…

    • kittenzrulz123@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      18 days ago

      Fairphone is the sort of phone for people who think LineageOS with an unlocked bootloader is secure made by a company who has sincerely promised to make things better but hasn’t substantially improved security (especially in how often they push security patches). Grapheneos is not a brand name you can just apply to give a phone more reputation, its an OS that represents the highest standard of security.

    • Routhinator@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      The Graphene devs explicitly only support Pixels. Sticking with Graphene means continuing to give Google the profits from your hardware.

      /e/OS is not bad as an alternative. The system wide ad and tracker blocking is nice.

      • Hemingways_Shotgun@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        19 days ago

        /e/OS is not bad as an alternative. The system wide ad and tracker blocking is nice.

        I switched to e/os on a couple of motorolas that supported it and it’s great so far.

        The comparisons to GrapheneOS are fair to some degree, but also not. Graphene is meant to be privacy and security hardened, whereas e/OS, while it is more secure than regular android, is more concerned with privacy hardening. The biggest misconception people have seems to be thinking that privacy and security are the same thing; and while that is true on the surface level, security (a la GrapheneOS) goes much deeper.

        So while my phone may not be as “hack resistant” as a GrapheneOS, it’s degoogled and very protective of tracking, which is what I’m primarily concerned with. So I’m happy.

        I just wish I could afford a fairphone in Canada.

      • mal3oon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 days ago

        This is a big issue that the fairphone doesn’t have its dtb open yet. It’s not easy to build ROM for it. Despite their core claim of sustainability, without addressing the blobs, it remains just a tad more convenient for green minded people. We need a full Fairphone.

        • 0x0@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          And besides that, fairphone is just greenwashing when it comes to repairability, good luck finding parts for previous generations.

            • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 days ago

              I think it is because 90% of company sustainability is simply greenwashing.

              Fairphone also had the whole “fairbuds” thing where they released tws earbuds (and then removed the headphone jack) and supported them for under 2 years before throwing them away and they are completely non-repairable, then acted like they didn’t exist.

              The new fairbuds are 10x better though, but I have heard the sound on both of their headphones is mediocre at best.