• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    not the same thing. AIGM is by definition not created by a human.

    if i tell you to create a song about a recent breakup i got through, gave you some notes about rhythm and maybe what kind of feel i would like it to have, and then you went ahead and composed the whole song, played all the instruments, provided the vocals, did the mixing and editing and gave me the result, do you think it’s fair to say i made the song?

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Same as vocaloid. Or autotune. How far do we go?

      Besides, again, who cares. If you like the music, enjoy it, if not, pass.

      • pyre@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        how is it like auto tune? auto tune corrects your singing, it doesn’t sing for you.

        also, humans care? that’s kind of the entire point of art? we care where art comes from. find the best painter in the world, have them make mona lisa’s exact copy, and see if it sells for even remotely similar price as Mona Lisa’s estimated value which is probably around a billion dollars. anyone can “enjoy” an exact copy, no?

        no. we care about art because art tells stories. human stories. computers don’t have stories to tell. they can imitate, but the best it can ever be will be as valuable as an imitation: not much.