• cron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    6 hours ago

    So Google is combining the slower UFS3.1 and UFS 4 in the models with higher storage capacity.

    How does this make the phone any faster than just going with UFS4 in the first place? Even midrange phones for less than a third of the price ship with UFS4 (E.g. Oneplus Nord 4 256G, Poco X7).

    (It’s probably fine, you don’t need the fastest flash for photos and videos. But the positivity of the article annoys me.)

    • baatliwala@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      They are using UFS3.1 in 128 GB, UFS4 in 256, ZUFS in 512 and above.

      Apparently there has not been even a single phone with UFS4 in 128 GB, it’s been 256+ only so sounds like there’s a limitation there with the lower storages. And it’s possible that ZUFS has similar limitation for 512+ GB I suppose, will have to wait and see as it seems to be new technology

      • cron@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        There are some phones featuring 1TB of UFS4.0, e.g. the Galaxy S24 Ultra or the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra

        • baatliwala@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Right but this ZUFS is new, this seems to be one of the first phones with that technology. UFS has existed before only for >=256 GB, so now we need confirmation if going forward ZUFS is only for >=512 GB… And also what on earth it exactly does because the article doesn’t have much technical details, as in how exactly creating zones improves speeds

          • cron@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Basically it is storage tiering. The operating system and the apps use the faster storage, while for other data, the slower storage is used.

            It’s similar to PCs a few years ago that featured a SSD (e.g. 256 GB) and a HDD (e.g. 2 TB).

            I don’t know what google is trying to achive, but it’s likely to cut costs and improve battery life. (If my assumption is true that the slower storage is cheaper and uses less energy).

  • potatopotato@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    9 hours ago

    This article makes no fucking sense. In a normal system, nothing you could reasonably call “zoning” should change flash read speeds. WTF are they talking about.