• xia@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Are we coming to (or past) a point where one needs to not update Android, for sanity’s sake, and risk getting hacked until an alternative rises?

      • Turret3857@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 days ago

        In terms of security alone custom (degoogled) Roms, even lineageos with an unlocked bootloader blows mobile Linux security out of the water. I would love to switch to a Linux phone for daily driving but I can’t until they nail down security or lineageos stops existing

    • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      7 days ago

      I genuinely don’t think I can ever return to stock Android after being used to GrapheneOS.

      This sucks, I have vendor locked-in myself to Google phones because everything else is so horrible. Why is there no company that provides phones with just barebones Android, with regular security updates and without Google/AI crap???

      • confusedboot@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 days ago

        They may be supporting more phones soon. Theyre talking with an OEM that may make phones that meet their requirements.

      • naeap@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        Could be, that this won’t go on (at least with newer pixels), because Google decided to close some source code

        • yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 days ago

          Even then, if they manage to support the Pixel 9a for the entire life cycle I can just switch to that in a few years and still have a couple years of updates.

          Plus I believe they could reduce the number of future supported devices which would make reverse engineering easier.

  • zecg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    For example, a restaurant app could expose an ‘order food’ function, allowing users to place an order with a voice command without even opening the app.

    No one seems to have any idea what to use this shit for, it’s always some ancillary bullshit that’s easier done with a few clicks.

    • FiveMacs@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      I just won’t ever even consider using an ‘app’ for a restaurant. give me a menu, and or a phone number and I’ll place my order like normal, else I won’t even bother if I’m forced to use an ‘app’ to get food. no thanks…my phone isn’t home for companies trash