I try to avoid it, but ever since search engines have gone to shit, it has forced me to use it for debugging code. Stack overflow, r/Cprogramming, minimal articles on the specific issue, have ceased to exist ever since AI generation. And why should it? Why would a user post an issue (for example, on stack overflow) wait for a few days to get a few responses, when they could get an instant response with AI. Search engines have gone to shit so much, that My fathers startup company has issued a premium license for chatGPT because of how dead Search engines are.

I hate it, I wish I didn’t have to use it, and yet this is my reality.

I don’t use AI when I’m learning a new system, framework or language because I won’t actually learn it.

I don’t use AI when I need to make a small change on a system I know well, because I can make it just as fast and have better insight into how it all works.

I don’t use AI when I’m developing a new system because I want to understand how it works and writing the code helps me refine my ideas.

I don’t use AI when I’m working on something with security or copyright concerns.

Basically, the only time I use AI is when I’m making a quick throw away script in a language I’m not fluent in.

I mostly use it as a code search tool, when dealing with large projects that I’m not very familiar with. Like I can ask “where is this component actually inserted into the web page” and it can sometimes point to a file and function. It doesn’t always work of course, but when it does it can save a lot of time.

I don’t ever let AI write code for me though

Yes because I can’t program.

I ask it to construct small blocks like if or for loop statements with a very verbose prompt so that all variables are properly named and the code block is small enough I can debug myself.

Basically is like building lego where the AI prints every piece.

1. It’s much more time consuming than if I knew the language myself but it’s actually a fun way to learn and it’s faster than wading through forums for n amount of time.
2. I don’t get paid to do it, so I don’t see it as problematic, my biggest gripe is I used to cite the stack overflow, etc, user where I got the snippet of code before and now I can’t give credit to the original author.
3. It’s useful since it has allowed me to automate a lot of tedious tasks that would otherwise be more time consuming, making the activation energy necessary to create the automation much lower.
4. I use mistral exclusively, the GPT 4, 4o and 5 are quite useless in comparison. The latest mistral and codestral tower above them in my anecdotal experience, at least the way I use it.
5. It works well with local models so I don’t have to feed the beast.
6. I’m an illiterate idiot when it comes to python so it has resulted in someone being able to do something they otherwise couldn’t.
7. I’m not a programmer, AI hasn’t made me a programmer, If I were a programmer, the code completion is so slow I’d probably not use it, I’m unaware of other uses other than debugging, but even for its own code, debugging is hit or miss, miss, miss because of limited context, it really can’t debug well.
8. It’s definitely not worth how many trillions are being poured into it. Especially when one uses it more and becomes painfully aware of the limitations, it becomes quite obvious that the applications lie in increasing industrial and scientific productivity rather than creating a mass market tool.
9. Agentic AIs are pure cancer and a security catastrophe waiting to happen. The ease with which one can use prompt injection to exfiltrate basically any kind of data the agent has access to is probably keeping many a cyber security experts awake at night. I envision, ironically, black hat being invaded by “prompt engineers” specialized in creating injection prompts.

Thank you for coming to my ted talk.

I tried to use AI to help me code, it only gave me trash.

I use continue in VSCode hooked to ollama or mistrial. Sometimes I just ask a chat to “make a script/config that does <my MVP of the project, maybe even less>”.

How much I use depends on how little I am invested. My rule is I try to correct a bad output ONCE. I cannot argue it into fucking getting it right.

I prefer net new code and add this feature. Ironically good refactoring goes a long way. The less it has to adjust the better, and less I have to review the better.

https://mtg-arena-deck-builder.web.app/ I used 100% Claude for this (im not a programmier)

I mostly dislike using AI to code. The one exception I recently got into was when I was fighting with a python script and didn’t understand why it was behaving the way it did. I used AI for possible causes and pretty quickly managed to fix it. Sometimes it’s just nice to have some possible causes for a bug listed so you can check them out

I have used AI to give me the syntax and function names I need, then researched those functions and found better ones instead.

I once asked AI to show me how to do something and it gave me a 20 line script. After 2 hours working with it, I finally got it to work. Another 30 minutes of optimizing and got it down to 3 lines. A bit more research and I discovered that what I wanted was actually a language feature, and I just needed to call a single function with a single argument.

AI occasionally saves me time, and usually causes a significant time waste.

The only code generation assistance I use is in the form of compilers. For fun I tried to use the free version of Chatgpt to replicate an algorithm I recently designed and after about half-hr I could only get it to produce the same trivial algorithms you find on blog posts even with feeding it much more sophisticated approaches.

-Type in chat, mostly for reference, snippets, help debugging, and questions about libraries or something.

-Not as much as I should

-ChatGPT is my favorite, I have been a user since day one and never tried any other ones.

-As someone who isn’t a leet tier programmer to just help, and write code snippets although I often have to modify it and do things myself as well because something’s the AI will fail at. Also after a certain level of complexity it starts to struggle. Better for snippets and examples but you have to integrate it yourself often times if you are creating something unique that the AI can’t more or less just copy and paste and translate.

Never used it, never will

I use whatever line completion is built into JetBrains out of the box. Other than that, no AI whatsoever.

Only about 10% of my time at work is actually spent writing code. At least double that time is spent reading code, and the rest is documentation, coordination, and communication work that depends on precise understanding of the code I’m responsible for. If I let AI write code, maybe (doubtfully) that would save a little time out of the 10%, but it would cost me dearly in the other two categories. The code I write by hand is minimal, clear, and easy to understand, and I understand it better because I wrote it myself. I understand all the code around it, too.

If you ask me, AI code generation is based entirely on non-programmers’ incorrect understanding of what programming is.

Snippets and architecture design ideas

Nobody uses “AI” because it doesn’t exist.

Nobody in this thread is talking about any program that’s remotely “intelligent”.

As far as technologies falsely hyped as “AI”, I use google’s search summaries. It’s usually quicker than clicking the actual sources, but I have that option as needed.