• DebatableRaccoon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Why do people eat food they know isn’t good for their health? Why do people continue to buy products from companies that have proven to only sell bad products or engage in scumbag practices?

    They all have the same answer.

    • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      It turns out in 1961 the American heart Association took bribery money from procter and gamble, who owned and sold “healthier Crisco” cooking oils that weren’t high in saturated fat, like beef and other cooking oils were.

      The AHA then claimed and pushed that saturated fats caused heart disease.

      Problem is, something like 88% of every study done in the past 60 years has found little to no link between heart disease and saturated fats.

      So beef, according to most studies, isn’t bad for you. The AHA was just crooked and on the take, being paid off to sell Crisco.

      Now it is calorie dense and people tend to eat too much of it, but that seems to be a lot of things. Don’t eat too much or you get fat. But apparently, you don’t have to worry about saturated fats being bad for you.

      • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        WHO report

        someone else online summarized the genetics part as the following:

        Mandelian randomisation studies show that LDL-c is causative in atherogenic plaques 1 and metabolic ward RCTs show that SFA intakes increase LDL-c, while the decrease in SFAs lead to lower total and LDL-c 2.

        But yes, almost all nutrition science is a bit inconclusive because of genetic variation.

  • sonofearth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Eating beef (or any meat for that matter) isn’t harmful but “excessive consumption” of “industrially produced meat” is. And you shouldn’t cut out meat from your diet — our bodies need those nutrients.

  • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    That’s because, if done right and from the right source, certain meats are actually good for the human body.

    Anybody who thinks that heart disease comes from eating meat does not understand that, despite the amount of research on it, meat cannot be considered to be bad for anyone’s health. Those that do have some research on it are going based upon flukes, fraud and lies, likely spread by witches and warlocks. I personally eat organic meat myself, and I have no health issues because of what I eat.

    As they say… “you are what you eat”. Also, I eat meat so vegans and vegetarians can have an easier time not eating meat. In a way, I’m helping them in some sense (as far as I’m aware, but I could be wrong on that).

  • DBT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    Because it’s a damn good source of creatine and protein. And it tastes good.

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    What a loaded question.

    Outside of the fact that a single cows life provides about 900 meals for humans, and the scraps left over make boots that last for a decade and also feed our cats and dogs. Plus, it’s delicious.

    • 0xD@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Imagine how many people you could feed if we would just eat what we fed the animals!

    • 7heo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah so, the amount of meals is correct. But that’s about it. I mean, I can’t say about the taste, to each their own, but one kg of cow meat needs two dozen kg of grain.

      That’s about as inefficient as it gets.

      As for the leather, the industry doesn’t like products that last a decade, so it isn’t actually using the leather in such a way. Industrial leather boots last a year tops.

      Finally, pet food is made out of discarded cuts of meat, the uglies, etc. But also lots of cereals, and vegetables.

      So we could really afford eating less meat. It isn’t good for anything. Not for us, not for the other species (certainly not for the cows, that get often half assed butchered in a hasty way because of quotas and profit), and absolutely not for the ecosystem.

      But I guess the taste is all that matters.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Cows are not all fed on grain. A lot of cows are ranched on land that would not be suitable for growing grain crops.

        • Digit@lemmy.wtf
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          9 days ago

          Or even land that is suitable for growing grain, but they’re kept being fed almost entirely on grass, for better quality, better health (and less cow farts, lol), rather than cost cutting nasty to bulk them up.

          • FaceDeer@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            9 days ago

            Well, if we’re talking pure food-production efficiency, then if the land is capable of growing grain then it’s probably better to grow grain there and feed the grain directly to humans.

            But upvote anyway for responding to a year-and-a-half-old thread, this is the oldest necro response I’ve received yet on the Fediverse. :)

            • Digit@lemmy.wtf
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              Well, if we’re talking pure food-production efficiency, then if the land is capable of growing grain then it’s probably better to grow grain there and feed the grain directly to humans.

              Well in that case perhaps we should do just algae and worms.

              Or maybe we should consider more than “pure food-production efficiency” in such a crude manner.

              Perhaps we should consider nutrition and health (of those eating the food, and the environment), more than just crude bulk quantity.

              Grain based diet would ruin our immune systems, and the health of the soil, without animal fertilizer.

  • thesink05@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not everyone has the time and resources to commit to every ‘good’ fight under the sun especially when the systemic problems are as deeply rooted in our society as they are.

    Which device did you post from? Did you vet it wasn’t made with slave labor? You might need to go recycle all your devices and unfortunately that will cut you off from getting your message out to the world.

    Your post does more harm to your cause than good because it just makes everyone angry at you.

  • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Where I live the beef is local and cheap. I’m not able to obtain enough protein without meat, as confirmed by a doctor and a nutritionist when I tried to go vegetarian. With food costs so high it’s cheaper to buy cow than anything else, but when I have the money I opt for fish or turkey. I looked into hunting but it’s prohibitively expensive for me with permits, tags, guns, licenses, days off and transportation. I tried fishing for myself as well, but whenever I get time to do it, there are warnings about eating fish in the area. When there aren’t I never catch anything big enough to legally be allowed to keep. I’d like to get chickens if/when local government ever lifts the bylaws preventing it.

  • thezeesystem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    The real question is, why should we try to not eat beef for the environment, when corporations make 90% of all pollution in the world.

    Maybe focus on the 90% of the problem and not the individual people who but meat?

    • BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      No corporation pollutes except to produce goods or services for human consumption, or for other businesses that provide goods or services for human consumption.

      Every gallon of gas burned is to power a vehicle to move you, or the goods you purchase.

      Every natural gas line leads to a house, of a business that sells things to houses.

      Theres no such thing as a corporation without consumers, we are where the buck is created, and where the buck stops.

  • FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    Because not everyone agrees that it’s terrible for Earth. And even some of those that do may not consider it so terrible for Earth that it’s not worth the tastiness.

    You’re wasting electricity running a computer right now, when we know that electricity generation is terrible for Earth. Why are you doing that?

    • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      I literally just called the uninformed position of “bad for the earth” out a little bit, and even have an anecdote of my positive personal experience eating meat. I get the sentiment for those who do eat meat, and get bullied just because they want to be healthy (while those who eat plants tend to have a lot of health issues, and can be overwight or obese by refined sugars, gluten, soy, seed oils and/or cow’s milk that’s GMO’d [a correlation some don’t seem to get]).

      Glad to see someone’s on a similar page about it, as that’s just some sort of silly thing to me.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    1 the amount of beef I eat is not a major contributer to the problem. No matter how hard I try. The actual major contributors what to distract people by telling them that they can make the difference. They can’t. 2 I don’t like plants… 3 the way the grow plants for food is also terrible for earth

    • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Plants actually cause a lot of health problems. For example…

      • Wheat and other forms of gluten happened to strip Vitamin B3, causing schizophrenia.
      • Seed oils mess up your brain in ways I can’t even imagine.
      • Cow’s milk is unnecessary due to the way it’s pasteurized, as unpasteurized, raw milk (goat’s milk is really fantastic for my needs) is actually good for you (which is why it’s banned in some countries).
      • Soy is good at kickstarting the transgendering process, as it alters the estrogen-testosterone balance (for males, it ups estrogen, where testosterone is upped for females who eat soy a lot)
      • Refined sugars actually cause a lot of issues, like diabetes (it dries up the liver), cancer (refined sugars are an excellent food source for parasites and polyps), obesity (sugar gets turned into visceral fat, and causes one to gain that), and a myriad of other issues.

      Do we see why I tend to eat beef a lot, and avoid these feed ingredients whenever I eat certain plants?

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        You started out decent, then went off the deepend. You are connecting plants to refined sugars in the end. An apple (from a plant) has no refined sugar. No plants do. And the milk thing sounds like a conspiracy theory. They ban raw milk because if it isn’t handled correctly, it can make you sick. While this is a bit of an over reach, in most places it started long before thier was an industry to protect.

        • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          What you did was take my comment slightly out of context. Fruit doesn’t have refined sugars, though they have fructose (which is a sugar that’s unrefined). If someone eats fruit, and they’re not of the body type to do that, health problems could arise from it. What I was doing was paraphrasing from studies I’ve read on each of the things here that I’ve gone ahead and researched myself.

          As for the milk thing, why do you think an Amish farmer was being railroaded for selling raw milk? That’s because raw milk, when handled properly, is fantastic for the body without the need for it to be pasteurized. That’s what he was doing, and daddy government didn’t like that one bit, so they wanted to pull a ritual on him just to ensure they get the message of “raw milk bad”. The goat’s milk cheese I eat comes from raw goat milk, and I do fine with it, in my experience. Your mileage may vary.

  • Regalia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have a eating disorder so most vegetables make me retch, so I kind of don’t have a choice.

    Also companies do way more emissions than I ever will, yet I’m asked to stop.

      • Regalia@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Carnivore diet is a weird way to phrase it, it really depends on the consistency of the food, but I do mostly eat meat because it causes the least problems.

    • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Carnivore is fantastic for those who need to heal from health issues. It’s expensive if you don’t know what you’re doing, but it’s worth it once you study it.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Ground beef and eggs can be quite reasonable when purchased in bulk from wholesale sources! Keeps my cost down