• blave@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      but the law is the law: just because you own something doesn’t mean you can do whatever you want with it.

      it’s illegal to kill someone with a smartphone, too

      • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Except we aren’t talking about the law. We are talking about corporations that sell you something and then retain control over it.

        You have no say in the process, you have no representation. These are not rules that we as a society have determined to be in the best interests of all of us. These are unilateral decisions placed upon us. You have no recourse if you disagree other than don’t use the thing.

        Guns don’t prevent you from doing anything. You still have the capability to do whatever you want with the thing. However, if you use it in a manner than harms someone else, in a way that we as a society have proposed, voted, and created laws prohibiting, then you deal with the consequences. But that is very different from having something in the gun that prevents it from taking ammo from another manufacturer. Or making it unable to shoot unless you pay a monthly fee.

        • blave@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 hours ago

          Except we aren’t talking about the law.

          of course we are. in a society, we live by laws which govern our behavior.

          regardless of whether you can accept that, it’s the facts.

          • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            30 minutes ago

            The guy you’re replying to celebrated the political assassination of Charlie Kirk, so I wouldn’t bother If I was you.

          • brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            No. We weren’t. This discussion was about phones and the software we are being allowed to install on them.

            The law does nothing to restrict us in that capacity. The restrictions are imposed by the manufacturer of the phone.

            You made the fallacious false equivalency of comparing that with guns and laws.

            • blave@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 minutes ago

              The law does nothing to restrict us in that capacity.

              there are countless laws which govern specifically how you use software and hardware. it’s hilarious you thought you could just spout such a plain and obvious lie, lol

          • Kissaki@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            57 minutes ago

            What makes you think the ICEBlock app removal is about the law or following the law?