Id like lemmings take on how they would actually reduce emissions on a level that actually makes a difference (assuming we can still stop it, which is likely false by now, but let’s ignore that)

I dont think its as simple as “tax billionaires out of existence and ban jets, airplanes, and cars” because thats not realistic.

Bonus points if you can think of any solutions that dont disrupt the 99%'s way of life.

I know yall will have fun with this!

  • over_clox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Ban planned obsolescence and make a rigorous standard that any new device is designed repairable, reliable and long lasting enough to last at least 10 years if treated right, 20+ years for vehicles and machinery…

    This whole ‘you gotta get a new thing every year’ era causes sooo much unnecessary waste and pollution ☹️

    • Azzu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      This would have almost 0 impact on climate change. It wouldn’t stop new stuff being produced and bought, people still want shinier things than they had yesterday, long lasting or not. It’d be a positive change, but not for climate change.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Many many would not get the new shiny. In my lifetime my vehicles have had few appreciable improvements. Mostly around safety like air bags and view cameras. I could care less about the radio and if I did its easy enough to upgrade that part.

      • over_clox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Make less shit, factories would slow down, less resources used, less pollution emitted, less energy used, and as a result, there would be at least some positive impact on climate change.

        Granted it might be minimal, even negligible, but it would make some difference.