

sounds like saying “we already have a lung in our body why make an iron lung.”
Like I know obviously it’s not like plug this into your spine and cure paralysis but I could definitely be very useful.
sounds like saying “we already have a lung in our body why make an iron lung.”
Like I know obviously it’s not like plug this into your spine and cure paralysis but I could definitely be very useful.
Nah A+1+2+3=65+49+50+51 so the answer is 215.
I… what? Fine since you can’t read anything with numbers less than 50% let me put it to you this way so MAYBE you understand.
Let’s assume you interact with 50 people a day(pretty low I interact with about 200 daily but I’m not gonna assume that’s normal), and let’s say 10 of those are probably friends family so we’ll ignore them. The probability of none of the other 40 being transphobic using your 31% would be (1-.31)^40=0.999999641 which is literally close enough to 100% to be considered a rounding error. Is that common enough for you?
I used Asian people as an example because it was a simple way to construe how low percents still are not rare because how many people we see daily. Using the same calculation there’d be a 91.5838% chance at least one person you see is Asian.
They said “everyone” accepts actors making a fake name, not specifically that everyone is transphobic.
Also, your study there ain’t doing that much to show its not common, as self-report/Social Desirability bias will skew that data but also saying they can live their life how they want doesn’t mean you’re not also transphobic… even ignoring that, at minimum 31% are? To say that isn’t common means you have to interact with fewer than 3 people daily, and that neither of those 2 happen to be transphobic. Sure if you stay at home and the only two people you see every day are the same two who have accepted you, congrats! Transphobia is cured! Otherwise… Yeah 1/3 people means it is EXTREMELY common. Like, to put it in perspective, Asians are like 6% of the population. Yet I wouldn’t exactly call seeing an Asian person “rare”.
You seem to be mistaking “majority” and “common”.
I suppose you could call your own actions something you are facing sure.
Pretty sure it’s in response to them using the theme song. Idk if Nintendo even owns the rights to that song outside of using it as the theme for their show though. Still people aren’t super happy with Nintendo going “we didn’t say they could use it but we are not taking it down like we would if it was a fan project.”
lol I missed that one. Beautiful.
Right? My immediate reaction. Surprised they’d put that of all shows but sure.
Edit: found it. https://github.com/chepecarlos/Lili-Sakura-
Nvm, now seems like maybe I can get the windows bizhawk version working but it won’t run to lua script correctly, again probably a “this isn’t windows” issue but, fuck if I know.
I’m… asking for a Linux emulator that can run a lua script. That’s not a problem with archipelago or jets of time. From my search all the easily available on Linux SNES emulators (looking mostly in bazaar on bazzite) do not have lua scripting available. So… I am asking for help on how to get one running with lua scripting enabled on Linux. I can get it working fine on windows because I was using SNES9x-rr but even trying to run that through proton did not work for lua scripting and I don’t know why.
I can play the generic randomizer fine, it’s the archipelago support that uses SNI to connect with a lua script that I need to be able to sync up with a host game. (Syncs your random items with random items in other people’s games they’ve chosen so you all unlock stuff for eachother as you play)
Who could’ve guessed completely unregulated synthetic nicotine in a capitalist hellhole could lead to poisoning people.
While there’s plenty they COULD turn into subscriptions (wifi for remote access, wifi for Apple air play, weather service, directions/charger finder service, smart key profiles, etc.) I have an Airya (essentially this bigger version of this leaf) and all that’s free. You can get a subscription to like… seriusxm radio/weather but… why?
Fair, I suppose I understand the idea but like… idk I can think of MANY reasons (patent bullshit, could be useful, or prove to be cheaper, or developed further into something better) why having something similar to an already existing process is still good. Look at Sodium batteries potentially now being 10% of the cost of lithium ones, even if they’re a similar but generally worse storage technology. I don’t think it should be a requirement that a new process or discovery have an inherent reason/advantage. Shit like that is how we end up with leaded gasoline.